Chapter 5980
The Charismatic Charlie Wade
David said with a very embarrassed expression:
âFather⦠the Chinese side disclosed the relevant history of the Sifang Baozhuang,â
âAnd mentioned the First Opium War, The history of the Second Opium War, and the Eight-Power Allied Forces.â
âNow the whole world knows that the Sifang Baozhuang was stolen along with millions of other cultural relics at that time.â
âIf we now go to China to negotiate and let them take out the Sifang Baozhuang it is not only unjustifiable legally,â
âBut also unjustifiable in terms of public opinionâ¦â
âPublic opinion?â Simon said angrily:
As he spoke, Simon asked him angrily:
âThe diamond on the King of Britainâs scepter was cut out of the Star of Africa!â
âThe Star of Africa is a diamond from South Africa! Edward VII took it,â
âCut it into hundreds of pieces of various sizes, and put them all into their own jewelry.â
âWhy did he have such a big face? Why canât he return the diamonds to the people of South Africa?â
âThey robbed a whole museum and a whole palace, but it was okay.â
âDmn it, our ancestors went to great lengths to snatch back a Sifang Baozhu from China.â
âThey have kept it at home for two hundred years. Why do you say that? Just return? Did I agree?!â
David bit the bullet and said: âFather, South Africa was a colony of Britain back then.â
âAccording to the international legal principles at that time,â
âThings in the colony belonged to the mother country.â
Even the people in the colony belonged to the mother country.â
âNot to mention that Edward VII took one Star of Africa, even if he took away all the diamonds in South Africa,â
âNo one can say that he broke the law.â
After that, David added: âBut our situation is different!â
âChina was invaded by the West, it was never colonial.â
âWhat was theirs was theirs. To put it bluntly, our ancestors took it from them.â
âIf we shamelessly went to negotiate with them, we would have no basis for public opinion.â
âThereâs no way to support it! Not only will the things not come back,â
âBut the whole world will be posting them on social networking sites and scolding him to death.â
âIsnât that just stealing the chicken but losing the rice?â
Simon became anxious and slapped him in the face and scolded angrily:
âba5tard! Do you mean to just watch the Sifang Baozhu return to China?!â
David was slapped, and felt extremely aggrieved,
But he did not dare to show it, so he could only say angrily:
âThenâ¦then Iâll tell my brother to come backâ¦â
After that, David turned around and was about to go out.
Not to mention how frustrated he was.
He was just here to report the news, and give objective suggestions by the way,
So as to prevent the old man from getting angry and doing something ridiculous.
But who would have thought that the old man not only refused to acknowledge his feelings,
But also slapped him in the face. What was he trying to do?
Itâs better to just follow his words.
If he wants the eldest brother to negotiate, then let the eldest brother negotiate.
When Simon saw him turning around to leave,
He felt a little uneasy and quickly stopped him: âDavid, wait a minute!â
David turned around and asked respectfully:
âWhat else does father have to say?â
Simon said: âContact the public opinion officer and the legal team,â
âAnd let them analyze the most reasonable way to handle this matter based on public opinion and legal principles.â
David nodded, immediately took out his mobile phone,â
âAnd called on the Routhchild familyâs video conferencing software.
Two heads of public opinion and legal teams.
One of these two people was a top journalist, and the other was a top lawyer.
They were both prominent figures in New Yorkâs upper class.
Later, they were all taken under the wing of the Routhchild family and became members of the Routhchild familyâs think tank.
Therefore, they are very concerned about every move of the Routhchild family.
They have long known that the Routhchild family is searching for the whereabouts of the Sifang Baozhu.
They also know that the Routhchilds are very passive in terms of public opinion because of the Sifang Baozhu.
And now, they have all received the news that Sifang Baozhuang has returned to the United States.
When David initiated the video conference, both of them jumped in immediately.
David asked the two of them in front of Simon:
âYou two should also know the news that Sifang Baozhuan has returned to China.â
âI wonder how you think it is more appropriate for us to protect our rights now?â
The person in charge of public opinion said: âSir, please forgive me, the current online public opinion is very unfavorable to us.â
âThe previous abuse of lynching of Peter Zhou in order to recover the Sifang Baozhuan has had a very serious negative impact.â
âNow the Sifang Baozhuang has returned to China if we keep silent and pretend that this matter has nothing to do with us,â
âIt is estimated that public opinion will no longer pay attention to this matter after a while.â
âHowever, if we stand up to negotiate and protest at this time,â
âIt is estimated that the family will be pushed into another storm againâ¦â
In another video dialog box, the head of the lawyer also said:
âMr. Routhchild, I think what Jim said is very reasonable.â
âWe were looking for the Sifang Baozhuang before,â
âBut we did not find the Sifang Baozhuang. His name has been made public,â
âAnd many of the image materials have been circulated internally by the people responsible for blocking New York.â
âIf we donât make any response, there wonât be much of a problem.â
After that, the lawyer added: âIn addition,â
âThis matter From a legal point of view, we canât stand it.â
âFirst of all, this antique is one of the countless treasures that the West seized from China,â
âAnd the Routhchild family has secretly hidden it in their home for so many years.â
âThis antique does not appear in any asset fair information or asset statistics.â
âIn other words, we have no evidence to prove that this Chinese antique is owned by the Routhchild family;â
âBesides, this thing was obtained by Peter Zhou from the Routhchild family.â
âAnd you just announced the withdrawal of the lawsuit, claiming that Peter Zhou did not steal anything from the Routhchild family.â
âIt was all a misunderstanding. The legal logic of the previous theft incident ends here.â
âThe self-consistency has been completed, but if you suddenly make representations to Chinese officials over the air and say that the thing is a stolen collection of the Routhchild family,â
âThen the context and logic of the thing will be missing and contradictory,â
âNo matter where it is. If we sue, our demands will not be supported by the courtâ¦â
Simon heard this and his whole body collapsed!
He never dreamed that his reconciliation with Peter Zhou would be a bad move!
As the lawyer said, he had already admitted that everything was a misunderstanding.
How could he now propose to the Chinese officials from afar that the Sifang Baozhu that had just returned to China was the personal property of the Routhchild family?
If he really did this, wouldnât the whole family be disgraced by him!